<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data Breach Double Talk Spin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.merchant911.org/blog/index.php/2009/03/03/data-breach-double-talk-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.merchant911.org/blog/index.php/2009/03/03/data-breach-double-talk-spin/</link>
	<description>Comments on credit card fraud from the E-Commerce Merchant point of view by Tom Mahoney, Founder and Director of Merchant911.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken H</title>
		<link>http://www.merchant911.org/blog/index.php/2009/03/03/data-breach-double-talk-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merchant911.org/blog/?p=194#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>Could it be an existing breach that was not fully discovered or disclosed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be an existing breach that was not fully discovered or disclosed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B</title>
		<link>http://www.merchant911.org/blog/index.php/2009/03/03/data-breach-double-talk-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merchant911.org/blog/?p=194#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>In my humble opinion, this sounds like the rhetoric that is splashed around the industry on almost a daily basis. Let us be clear, as usual, big business is going to not follow responsible practices, such as informing the public about breaches as soon as they are found. It is up to organizations like Merchant 911 to inform us wee individuals, as we are NO Visa, Mastercard, or Citi Bank. I see this as fuel for future congressional investigation, and hopefully someday, policy change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion, this sounds like the rhetoric that is splashed around the industry on almost a daily basis. Let us be clear, as usual, big business is going to not follow responsible practices, such as informing the public about breaches as soon as they are found. It is up to organizations like Merchant 911 to inform us wee individuals, as we are NO Visa, Mastercard, or Citi Bank. I see this as fuel for future congressional investigation, and hopefully someday, policy change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Glick</title>
		<link>http://www.merchant911.org/blog/index.php/2009/03/03/data-breach-double-talk-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Glick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.merchant911.org/blog/?p=194#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Do they think we have &quot;stupid&quot; stamped on our foreheads.

How can it not be a new breach if the entity has yet to disclose?

They must think we&#039;re as dimwitted as they are!

The feeblemindedness of the entire global banking industry worries me greatly!

Or, maybe they&#039;re just all insane.  Einstein defined madness as doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they think we have &#8220;stupid&#8221; stamped on our foreheads.</p>
<p>How can it not be a new breach if the entity has yet to disclose?</p>
<p>They must think we&#8217;re as dimwitted as they are!</p>
<p>The feeblemindedness of the entire global banking industry worries me greatly!</p>
<p>Or, maybe they&#8217;re just all insane.  Einstein defined madness as doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

